Re: Message Header Field Registry - revised proposal

Thanks,  then I agree with Charles.

#g
--

At 08:19 PM 2/28/02 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:

> >  Aren't experimental RFCs last-called?
>
> they don't have to be.  IESG can ask for one, but it's not required.
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham(_dot_)Klyne(_at_)Baltimore(_dot_)com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------