[Top] [All Lists]

Re: X-* header fields

2004-01-22 19:47:51

My own, primary concern about them is having an "experimental" header
become a defacto standard and then having to find a way to get folks to
use a new, non-X header name for it.  I believe that hasn't been
successful yet, or at least not much.

why does it work better in the case of Experimental vs Standard MIBs?
(or do you think that doesn't work well either?)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>