Re: a header authentication scheme

Bart Schaefer writes:
> I didn't say there's no reason to allow the processing.  I said 
> there's no reason for the end recipient to believe the Processed: 
> header, whether or not said header appears to be tied to a Received: 
> line, except on the last hop.
Oh, sorry. I misunderstood then. I more or less agree with what you're 
saying, in that case.  (Except that IMO, hops internal to the 
destination organization can often be trusted.)
Arnt