Re: standards spring cleaning

> > Don't forget Informational RFCs.  For example, RFC 1344 has
> > some very important advice for gateway implementors (and
> > that includes software which acts as a gateway, such as
> > message scanners).   Unfortunately some such implementors
> > have ignored 1344, resulting in problems:
> > http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836088
Actually, neither RFC 1344 nor RFC 2046, in my opinion, draw sufficient 
attention to this problem.  In both cases, I would be happier if we had 
said something in the security considerations about the necessity to 
reassemble message/partials into their "parent" message before applying 
any security-related content scans.