Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-legacy-fields-00.txt2005-04-22 07:51:28On Thu April 21 2005 22:49, Keith Moore wrote: would that be like fighting useless sarcasm with more useless sarcasm? The question is really off-topic for the mailing list, but the answer is "no". Now, if you know of any unregistered but RFC-documented message header fields which aren't included in RFC 4021 registration forms or the draft, contrary to the requirement of section 3 of BCP 90, that might be a useful topic for either this mailing list or the ones mentioned in BCP 90.
|
|