In <20050629070218(_dot_)GA30094(_at_)ender> Laird Breyer
<laird(_at_)lbreyer(_dot_)com> writes:
If it really has to be tried out, wouldn't a few content types
make more sense to test the waters? A CTE which replaces them can
always be defined some years later, and in the meantime it doesn't
force all standards compliant software to implement a decompressor.
How about:
Content-Type: application/compressed; protocol=gzip;
uncompressed-type="image/jpeg" (; and all parameters of the
uncompressed type allowed here)
Content-Type: application/compressed; protocol=gzip;
uncompressed-type="text/html"; charset=iso-8859-1
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5