ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-822] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF

2016-08-14 20:37:58
from [Dave Crocker] [Permanent Link] 
On 8/14/2016 6:34 PM, Sean Leonard wrote:

I have been working with RFC 5234 lately. What is the rationale (or what are 
the rationales) for including SP %d32 but excluding HTAB %d9 in char-val, aka 
the literal text string? I am sure that this decision was not an oversight.


I don't recall.  Sorry.  I could generate guesses, but that's all they'd be.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
ietf-822(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [ietf-822] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF, Sean Leonard
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-822] [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF, Carsten Bormann
Previous by Thread:  [ietf-822] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF, Sean Leonard
Next by Thread:  Re: [ietf-822] [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF, Carsten Bormann
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]