ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within c onsent paradigm

2003-07-02 14:55:27


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Wyman [mailto:bob(_at_)wyman(_dot_)us] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:03 PM
To: 'Yakov Shafranovich'; asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining 
spam within consent paradigm


Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
for the purposes of the consent framework do we even need
to define spam? Or should we just provide the mechanisms 
and framework, and let each individual implementor, end-user 
and ISP decide on their definitions?
      No. The consent framework need not be concerned with 
whatever arbitrary definition of spam anyone might use. The 
only thing the framework needs to "understand" is that some 
mail is sent with consent and other mail is not. If the 
mechanisms are there, then a thousand definitions of "spam" 
can be supported transparently.

              bob wyman

Exactly!

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within c onsent paradigm, Paul Judge <=