ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 7. Best Practices (was RE: [Asrg] Trustic anti-spam system c loses down because it doesn 't work)

2003-08-07 11:33:28
At 08:17 PM 8/6/2003, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
....

> The constant drumbeat of "censorship" cries is merely
> an attempt to
> prevent users from obtaining help in rejecting spam, and given the
> technical difficulties involved in do-it-yourself spam
> reduction, can only
> be classified as pro-spam propaganda.

A problem has been identified with blacklists and backed up with examples of
the problem occurring.

I do not believe that we should ignore that fact that depending on data from
a wide range of sources is an issue. If the issue is recognized there is a
good probability it can be fixed. Pretending the issue does not exist is a
sure way to ensure that it becomes a problem.

How and where would we address the problem? Should we address it within the context of Best Practices or perhaps as part of the requirements? And who is willing to volunteer some time to write and coordinate efforts in the this area?

Yakov

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: 7. Best Practices (was RE: [Asrg] Trustic anti-spam system c loses down because it doesn 't work), Yakov Shafranovich <=