ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements and what is spam

2003-11-18 06:40:42
 

-----Original Message-----
From: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] 
On 
Behalf Of Brett Watson
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:28 AM
To: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements and what is spam

Forget about defining "spam". At its broadest, "spam" is just 
"anything that I deem inappropriate for my inbox". In its 
narrower forms, "spam" is just a common specific instance of 
that, like "unsolicited bulk email", but the specific 
instance is not necessarily a pure subset of the general instance. 
The general instance has the benefit of satisfying all 
comers; the specific instance has the benefit of being 
recipient-independent.

In my view, the owner of a particular inbox is the proper 
authority on what is appropriate for that inbox, and anything 
which plans to be a solution to "spam" should therefore deal 
with the problem in its broadest sense. Is there a compelling 
reason to deal with recipient-specific instances of the 
problem (even common ones), rather than the problem in general?

The focus should be on how to empower mail *recipients* to 
set their own mail policies and make everyone else deal with 
it, as contrasted with the current situation in which the 
*senders* have the upper hand. Why should I, as a mail 
recipient, allow anything in my inbox that I don't want? A 
perfect implementation of such an ideal is almost certainly 
impossible, but that's the target we should be aiming for in 
the fight against "spam". (No doubt this implies a research 
direction, such as overcoming the ability of the sender to 
lie with impunity, hence the spirit of LMAP.)

It's possible that the fight against the general case will 
involve the development of many specific countermeasures 
(rather than a single general one), and the ability of 
recipients to choose which countermeasures they apply, but 
there is no question in my mind that the ASRG should approach 
"spam" in its broadest sense.

Regards,
TFBW


YES!  Very well stated!
I Agree with what is said above.
:-)

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>