On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:00:39 -0500 Kee Hinckley
<nazgul(_at_)somewhere(_dot_)com> wrote:
At 11:53 AM -0800 11/21/03, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
5) The do not spam registry is unlikely to reduce the effectiveness and will
significantly reduce the first ammendment uncertainty in connection with the
act.
I'm looking forward to seeing how I'm supposed to add 40,000
non-existent somewhere.com addresses to a do-not-email registry.
last i heard, domain wide opt-out was part of the do-not-spam list, so
*(_at_)somewhere(_dot_)com should do nicely for most purposes.
i sure hope domain wide opt-out is still in there, it's the only thing that
can even remotely make the bill tolerable.
richard
--
Richard Welty
rwelty(_at_)averillpark(_dot_)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg