Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>:
I took a look at the RFCs, It does not appear to be the case that the ADV
mechanism ever made it into an RFC.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2635.txt?number=2635
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2505.txt?number=2505
Do Congress think they are pointing to an existing document here?
Probably not. But I don't see that it matters, either, ADV: is the
closest thing to an established convention there is -- the drafters
of CAN-SPAM have probably (a) seen it and (b) don't really care whether
it's already in an RFC or not.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg