I'm not convinced, from first brief reading, what the benefit of all this
is.
"X-" exists to permit non-standard headers. Most users of "X-" use them for
either conveying proprietery information or for making a human readable
trace.
If there is a need for general interoperability around a topic proposing a
new header is not necessarily the most important step.
I don't get a clear and unambigous statement of requirements or
specifiaction for this functionality.
Don't get me wrong, I haven't had time to fully digest it, but on first
reading it seems to have a very large scope and it responds with a proposal
which is not currently supported by anyone.
d.
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Philip Miller |
| | <millenix(_at_)zemos(_dot_)n|
| | et> |
| | Sent by: |
| | asrg-bounces(_at_)ietf|
| | .org |
| | |
| | |
| | 16/10/2004 06:09 |
| | AM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: ASRG - Filtering Subgroup
<filtering(_at_)asrg(_dot_)sp(_dot_)am>, ASRG <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: [Asrg] Filtering Header Draft Discussion
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hello, all!
I have a few days of relative free time, of which I plan to spend a fair
portion reviewing
and revising the draft. The current version can be found at
<http://millenix.zemos.net/asrg-filtering/>
in xml2rfc source, HTML, and TXT formats. The Subversion repository with
the XML source
can be found at
<http://millenix.zemos.net/repos/filtering/>
In particular need of work are the definitions of the fields that will be
standardized in
format. Proposals on how various types of scores should be expressed are
much desired
I'd like to talk to anyone who has comments on this in realtime at some
point in the next
4 days. I'll try to be online in the ASRG jabber channel as much as
possible, but
afternoon to evening of tomorrow (Oct. 16th) and Oct. 19th would be best.
If you can't or
don't want to discuss this in Jabber, but have thoughts, please email them
to the
Filtering Subgroup list.
Philip Miller
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
***************************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s)
only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the
message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately on 0141 306
2050 and delete the message from your computer. You may not copy or forward it
or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications
are capable of data corruption Student Loans Company Limited does not accept
any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. For
this reason it may be inappropriate to rely on advice or opinions contained in
an e-mail without obtaining written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans
Company Limited or the sender accepts any liability or responsibility for
viruses as it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and
views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the
opinions and views of The Student Loans Company Limi!
ted.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.
**************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg