On Thu, Oct 21, 2004, Claus Assmann wrote:
Wouldn't it be simpler to support MTAmark instead of some naming
scheme? Maybe an organization has some guidelines it needs/wants
to follow for naming hosts; MTAmark wouldn't interfere with that
but still allows others to find out whether a system is supposed
to send mail.
Claus, you are correct, provided MTAmark is implemented. What is the
status of MTAmark? MTAmark seems to be a modification of the DNS
specification, so how long before everyone's BINDs get up to date?
To be really honest, I'm small fry. I don't do my own DNS -- I let my
registrar do it. And the interface they have doesn't seem to allow for
TXT records.
Doug Campbell
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg