ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BCP suggestion, port 25 control RE: [Asrg] BCP suggestion: port-b locking by ISPs

2004-12-14 13:27:29
Finally there is the ethical side - and the bottome line there is simply
that this is unacceptable behaviour.

And a couple of things you did not mention..

Putting aside the ethical issues (just for a short moment) there is also the issue of a virus still being malicious software. Why? Not getting into term and definition arguments - it does something that the user did not ask for, on the user's machine.

Say we don't care... controlling replication of malicious code is extremely difficult. When attempted before, it caused the falling of entire networks, just last year.

Also.. who said viruses are bug free or well written? A programming error of some sort.. say.. even a buffer overflow could be disastrous.

And how the heck is someone REALLY supposed to control how, when and where a single sample spreads. It never worked. It has been attempted more than just a few times.

Add to that the fact that it doesn't actually solve the problem, and you still haven't covered everything of why it is a bad thing.

Back to ethical - writing viruses is simply a no-no.

        Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>