gep2 wrote:
I think it makes perfect sense to put a suitably restrictive set of
acceptability rules on E-mails coming from previously unknown senders...
loose
enough to allow for initial contacts, but tight enough to trip up most
spam
(and, at a minimum, tight enough to ban the tricks that are commonly used
to
evade antispam content filtering). And, of course, to virtually eliminate
worms
and viruses (the genesis of so many spambot zombies) arriving in E-mails.
What is the leanest, cleanest message that a spammer would be happy
sending? How is it distinguished from a 'good' message from an previously
unknown sender?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg