You identify bots as the principal current source of spam and you
may be right - you are not the first to posit this on this list. I
would, however, like to see some evidence.
It's easy enough to find if you look for it.
What I do see is a lack of evidence in the form of articles written
on technology in serious newspapers, particularly those advising on
the use of technology.
That's all secondary or tertiary sources. I know the guy who used to
write a lot of spam articles for the NY Times who told me that he's
moved on to other stuff because the spam news is just repetitive.
He's a good reporter but he depends on us weenies for his data.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg