On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Chris Lewis <clewis(_at_)nortel(_dot_)com>
wrote:
> Determining the network provider helps establish their reputation,
> which should represent a significant factor in whether their
> advertised space can be trusted.
Very few existing (at least public) DNSBLs pay any attention whatsoever
to this. Those that do usually do little more than ad-hoc aggregate
statistical reports, eg http://cbl.abuseat.org/country.html and
http://cbl.abuseat.org/domain.html, or Spamhaus's country/provider top
100 listings, or Cymru's or helping guide the manual escalation of
manual listings...
MAPS seems to be the only one pushing for inclusion of this
requirement. Unless there's strong evidence that other BLs find it to
be a best practice, I say we call the discussion closed on this point
and move on.
It's not only too "type of BL" specific, it seems to be specific only
to a single BL.
Regards,
Al Iverson
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg