--On 2 July 2009 14:13:49 +0000 John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
If we're going to go back to first principles, how 'bout discussing
the purpose of the ASRG? I joined thinking the word "research" was
in there somewhere, but it's clear there's no research going on --
and none likely to occur.
As far as I can tell, based on the papers at CEAS, there's precious
little spam-related research going on anywhere.
If people here were willing to put 1/10 of the work into research that
they do into arguing, we might have some actual research.
Perhaps I should make it so that whenever you update the wiki (where
we are ever so slowly building a taxonomy of anti-spam techniques
<http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Taxonomy_of_anti-spam_techniques>
and
even more slowly of spamming techniques)
<http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Taxonomy_of_spamming_techniques>
"this is a place holder until some real content can be added" lol!
you get a credit that allows
you to send one message.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg