--On 2 July 2009 13:03:12 -0400 Chris Lewis <clewis(_at_)nortel(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 2 July 2009 12:27:57 -0400 Chris Lewis <clewis(_at_)nortel(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Bill Cole wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote, On 7/2/09 6:23 AM:
Exercise for the reader: why aren't spammers using the @ibm.com
domain?
You provided the answer before the question.
Somewhat. Because spammers _are_ using @ibm.com too. I got samples ;-)
Ok, but it's trivial to reject them after checking SPF.
Don't need to. They're all being rejected by either "no such user" or
the spam filter rejects.
SPF isn't worth the cycles nor bandwidth (in this environment at least)
to catch the rare SPF -all.
<http://spf-all.com/>
There are a few prime domains that publish -all records.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg