On 01/Mar/10 20:25, John Levine wrote:
This is very sensible, but when you say "single<user action>", are you voicing
support for the notion that only a single bit of data will be transmitted? Or will the
vocabulary be richer than that? How about an extensible vocabulary?
If it sends an ARF report, you can put whatever you want in the ARF, although I
wouldn't want to attempt to standardize a lot of stuff that nobody uses.
But what is the relationship between the report and the button?
Apparently, "single<user action>" excludes automated reports.
If you want to encode stuff in the ARF report to say whether the opinion is
from a human or from software, you can, although it is again not clear how
useful that would be.
That field may be useful in sorting out a report's consumers in a
generalized FBL. Some mailbox providers notify via FBL when users hit
that button, but not when messages are automatically blocked.
Also, humans make errors in a different way than software, hence any
correction mechanism should be differently tailored.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg