On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, John Levine wrote:
New and I hope final revision of the DNSBL BCP.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists/
I'd like to publish this as an ASRG document sooner rather than later.
So please take a look at it and say:
a) I agree with what it says, OK for ASRG consensus.
b) I have minor reservations but don't object to publishing it, OK for
ASRG partial consensus.
c) It's so wrong that you shouldn't publish it unless you change X to
Y. (Be sure to fill in X and Y.)
I believe the syntax for queries should be specified in this document.
While the syntax for IP address queries is standardized in practice (and
shown in examples in the text) I am not sure the syntax (especially
translation of invalid characters) of URIs is fully standardized. I
haven't used such services yet, so perhaps I am wrong about practice.
Isn't this the opportunity to do so? Standardization of the query makes it
simple for clients to switch among servers.
I should add that I am in agreement with policy advice in the document and
wouldn't actually oppose it if asked.
Daniel Feenberg
R's,
John, ASRG chair
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg