On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Claus v. Wolfhausen <
c(_dot_)v(_dot_)wolfhausen(_at_)spamkiller(_dot_)uceprotect(_dot_)net> wrote:
Really technical important things got a "SHOULD" OR "RECOMMENDED" while a
the content of a policy (if there is a payment option or not) got a "MUST
NOT"
I'm inspired to draft a BCP on BCP interpretation, which would include, but
not be limited to
"advice in BCP documents MUST NOT be misinterpreted as anything other than
opinion"
unfortunately the margins of this e-mail are too small ...
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg