This is precisely what DKIM does. It is the domain administrator who
defines the DNS records used by DKIM and DKIM's granularity of the
validated identity is a domain name.
That is not correct. The local part of the i= is intended to
provide a binding to the local part of outside origination
headers, not just the domain part. Which is why it is,
in fact, a primary goal.
Since i= is optional, it seems difficult to argue that it demonstrates the
tie-in to other identity header fields as primary goal.
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim