--- Earl Hood <earl(_at_)earlhood(_dot_)com> wrote:
I think it is worth back-tracking to understand why there are people,
including myself, looking to make DKIM more extensible.
A core problem with DKIM is that it combines several components
together when they can be separated, allowing for greater flexibility
and choices. DKIM violates basic software design principles.
You mean a simple, utility-specific, easily-implementable specification goes
against the grain of basic software design principles? Is that like saying a
hammer is a bad choice for driving nails because it's not flexible enough to
apply paint to walls?
I guess my question is: Why do you want greater extensibility? What problem are
you wanting to solve? Is the specific problem that DKIM attempts to address,
not important enough and not complex enough to justify having a simple,
tailored solution?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim