On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The point that I have been arguing however is that where a protocol is
ALREADY DEFINED the charter should allow discussion of the relationship
between DKIM and the existing work.
Why don't you write a draft that specifies how DKIM should be extended in
the way that you want? The hooks are there in the base spec.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim