On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 09:47 -0800, Douglas Otis wrote:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
And the title of this thread is bogus.
I may have missed explaining how a binding approach removes the eye-
test. Consider binding information has been retained for important
correspondents within a DKIM aware MUA. When subsequent messages arrive
offering the same set of identifiers, (based upon binding assurances
such as email-address, signing-domain, and perhaps opaque-identifier,)
this message would be highlighted in some fashion. When a look-alike
email arrives, it would not be highlighted.
At that point, the user would be alerted and could then examine the
identifiers using a fixed character-set to decide the disposition of the
message, and whether the identifiers should be included within the
profile for that entity.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org