What is still pending on the document?
I guess there were at least a number of minor to middling
issues raised on the list and in Vancouver. Things like
having an abstract description of the signing process etc.
In the Threat Analysis discussions I have been struck by the difference
in clarity and apparent consensus on the issues that pertain to the core
functions, versus those that pertain to the "policy" functions.
[...]
All of this suggests that de-coupling the TA for the core functionality,
from that of the policy-related enhancements, will be necessary if we
are to stay on schedule.
I think that that may turn out to be the case, but I'd rather
see the next revision and work from there.
Cheers,
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org