Stephen Farrell wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> If a domain owner publishes an open policy, and if some "bad"
> unsigned messages apparently emanate from that domain then the
> domain owner's reputation may suffer.
Why would any rational reputation system make such an assertion?
I dunno, I was paraphrasing. And that's why I also said:
> I think that that's true,
> but of course its already true today without DKIM or SSP.
(Are reputation systems really rational - must get that Turing
test dusted down so:-)
Sorry, I was mainly reacting to Frank's endorsement of your
list's inclusion. I don't really think this point is a valid
threat.
Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org