Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: z= field and EAI wg

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Even if it doesn't hit anywhere else, presumably the EAI work will
> have to be taken into account for the z= field, with potential
> changes being required to the current ABNF?
I'm not sure about the ABNF, but why would it otherwise affect us?
The z= is only a qp encoded blind copy of the bytes present. We don't
define any semantics.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html