[ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually *using* n= in their dns records?

ietf-dkim

[ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually using n= in their dns records?

2006-03-26 09:25:29

And why would one want to?  What sort of information would be conveyed
and how?  Is it something that would be included in a diagnostic MDN?

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*[ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually using* n= in their dns records?*, Eliot Lear* <= *Re: [ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually using* n= in their dns records?*, Tony Hansen* *Re: [ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually using* n= in their dns records?*, Mark Delany*

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Splitting the DKIM base doc, Eliot Lear
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] New issue: optional exponent needed or not?, Stephen Farrell
Next by Thread:	*Re: [ietf-dkim] base: is anyone actually using* n= in their dns records?*, Tony Hansen*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]