On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:07:19PM -0700, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote:
Is this r= thing fundamental to that [verification] function or
could it be developed as a separate exercise above and beyond the
base?
A good point. There is no desire...
Doug. As far as I can tell, your 420 word reply said neither yes or
no. But to be frank, I stopped reading after the second
paragraph. Sorry.
The good news is that the first 100 words seemed like they were
trending towards a no, so I'll run with that.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html