ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session)

2006-05-18 11:28:24
v=0.2 v=1 and how about v=t for experimental? 

Bill Oxley 
Messaging Engineer 
Cox Communications, Inc. 
Alpharetta GA 
404-847-6397 
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Eric Allman
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:02 PM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session)

As discussed in this morning's Jabber session, I have changed the 
"v=" tag in the DKIM-Signature header field from "MUST NOT" to 
"MUST", with an initial value of "0.2".  We'll expect this to go to 
"1" when the spec is published.

eric
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>