Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft...2006-10-18 12:46:26Phill,On the plus side, you're right that it captures a good snapshot of a completed milestone. On the other hand, it's very heavy weight. Yet another AD review + IETF Last call + IESG review + RFC Editor time. If it helps drive IETF consensus in the end, then it is probably worth it. And it could in this case. Eliot _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|