Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional lookups

> There will be questions about whether a message is abusively being replayed. 
> There may be questions about what email-address is assured.  Assurances could 
> become problematic when the signing domains and the email addresses are 
> expressed differently.
Um, this must be a different DKIM than the one in the -10 draft.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html