ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unequal treatment RE: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll)

2007-03-05 09:50:53
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:01:18 -0000, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

Phillip,

To summarize some of this discussion, the chain of events is this:

- The VERIFIED address perhaps along with the message is used as input to whatever reputation system there is. The reputation service will return a value of ACCEPT or REJECT for each message. - UNVERIFIED leads to a query to SSP. The results of the SSP query along with the message will be fed to the reputation service to produce a result of ACCEPT or REJECT.

However, you want to be able to provide the reputation/whatever service with all the information which could be useful to it in reaching its conclusion, and that could well include a further breakdown to the nature of the UNVERIFIED.

--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131     Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>