On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:45:16PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi All,
At today's DKIM meeting (notes to follow) we discussed
the in/exclusion of requirement 5.3.10 in ssp-reqs [1]
(the current text is below). We didn't have a clear
consensus at the meeting despite an extended discussion
and a lot of previous list traffic.
We need to decide this now in order to finish the
ssp-reqs work and to start the ssp work, so Barry and
I will collate the responses to this in a week and
we'll then make the call about what to do.
Wordsmithing is another thing, but we've discussed
this enough to decide now. So, *please* just pick
an option and don't lets divert this to discussing
a different question.
This is also Issue #1386 in the tracker [2].
Your choices:-
1) Exclude this requirement (don't mention it)
2) Include this requirement as a MUST NOT
3) Include this requirement as a MAY
4) Inlcude this requirement as a SHOULD
5) Inlcude this requirement as a MUST
#1
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html