Steve Atkins wrote:
so, perhaps, an SSP record by the signing domain that says MailFrom is
valid?
Possibly. What's the problem you're trying to solve?
I really hate it when people ask pragmatic questions like that. I mean,
really Steve, didn't you know that value propositions are soooo pasé?
But I suppose I have to answer it:
I'm about to generate a bounce-category message. If I'm suspicious enough of
the original message, I might decide not to. By way of trying to squelch bad
bounce traffic at its source.
Given the DKIM sig and the "Return" SSP record, I'll generate it since the
return address domain has said it's valid.
John Levine wrote:
> Personally, I'd rather use BATV.
That filters at the destination, not the source.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html