Dave Crocker wrote:
The SSP document applies the label "suspicious" to messages that well
might be legitimate and fails to apply it to ones that are not.
Actually, it's "Suspicious" (note the initial capital S) and if the
issue is that the term is confusing, that is being tracked as issue #1530.
At a minimum, the SSP document needs to provide a very clear statement
of the types of problematic messages it will "catch" and the type that
it will not (ie, fail to catch.)
This is issue #1527.
I recommend that this issue be closed as a duplicate of the above two
issues.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html