Douglas Otis wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Hector Santos wrote:
DKIM-BASE Verify Results:
NONE - No signature in mail
PASS - Good Signature, Original Address Signer
PASS 3P3 - Good Signature, 3rd party Signer
FAIL - Bad Signature, Original Address Signer
FAIL 3P3 - Bad Signature, 3rd party Signer
Hector,
This breakdown provides only limited value for assessing benefits, and
nothing in terms of creating a specification.
I believe it does.
A specification should
not attempt to dictate message disposition weighting.
This analysis does not.
Nevertheless,
this breakdown should be adjusted to recognize that an invalid signature
is equivalent to no signature per the specification.
It did. Read the message again.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html