Doug,
Douglas Otis wrote:
DKIM can make an improvement by allowing the signer to clearly
indicate which identity provided the message while also indicating all
messages are signed. This identity does not need to match with the
entity found within the From header. Any MUA highlighted information
should exclude that not included within the signature's hash and not
encompassed by the key g= and t= restrictions.
[etc.]
You make a number of points that might be valid issues, but I can't tell
because they're all mixed together and all under the subject line of
issue 1525.
Now that ssp-02 is out and doesn't say anything about "first Author",
can we move this discussion to a more relevant subject?
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html