ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages

2008-02-13 12:13:54

Jim Fenton wrote:
The MUST only occurs in conjunction with publishing SSP records. This does not mandate publishing of MX records when SSP is not used.

-1 to this proposal, for the reasons that Wietse and Frank have mentioned. Furthermore, if the domain publishes an SSP record, the SSP lookup algorithm never gets to the step that might benefit from the publication of an MX record.

+1 to your -1.  In other words, I agree with you.
d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>