At 15:33 13-02-2008, Jim Fenton wrote:
Interesting idea. In 4871, we do have the s= tag and the DKIM
Service Types registry. Perhaps SSP should specify which service
type(s) to which the record applies; for completeness we should
probably have a way of specifying multiple (service type, policy)
groups, although the only service type in the registry now is "email".
DKIM is also referenced in SIP. To make room for a service type, you
could have a record such as email._ssp._domainkey.example.com.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html