[ietf-dkim] [psg.com #1545] [Comment] signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP2008-04-04 06:14:47https://rt.psg.com:443/Ticket/Display.html?id=1545 This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s): Closed based on IETF Philly meeting and confirmed consensus. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|