Jim Fenton wrote:
I can definitely live with "approximate". I don't think
"overapproximate" is even a word, or if it is, it may mean
something else so let's avoid that one.
How about "minimal approximation" ? Proposed text:
| A minimal approximation of a complete "nomailfqdn" check as
| specified in [2821bis] section x.y is an NXDOMAIN (rcode 3)
| result for a domain lookup, see [RFC 103?] section a.b.
RFC 1034 or 1035, I'm too lazy to find the relevant sections.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html