I can't find the term "intermediary" or "end system" anywhere in ssp-04,
and the term third-party occurs only in section A.4 and the table of
contents for A.4. There is also no section 3.1.2
Is the text being objected to in this issue still present in the
document?
I do think it's important to make it clear that non-Author signatures
are not inherently worthless, just out of scope for this draft. I
believe that point is made at least partially in section A.4.
Ellen
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:53 AM
To: ietf-dkim
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1554: Third parties in "overview"
Issue description: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1554
Thread: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009690.html
I didn't see a clear consensus on what to do for this. Since
the change calls for adding additional explanation in an area
where (it seems from the list) we're not clear on what terms
to use in such additional text, I think in the absence of
further discussion the best thing might be to close this one.
If no-one objects, I'll ask Eliot to close this on July 11th.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html