Just to make sure I understand:
The decision is to remove all hints of being normative? (Per the recent
exchange on the IETF mailing list, this won't hinge on case.)
d/
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Issue description: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1561
Thread: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009790.html
From the thread people seem to support the thrust of the comment, i.e.
to reduce/eliminate 2119 language where possible and definitely
avoid it (regardless of case) where its not needed.
Suggest we leave this open for now to let the editors concentrate
on the overview and process the deployment draft issue subsequently.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html