[ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt]

ietf-dkim-request(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org wrote:
> The draft doesn't specify a discussion venue.  I believe the plan is to 
> request 
> Informational RFC status.
>
> With respect to the IETF, is there a better place for discussion than the 
> DKIM list?
>   
mail-vet-discuss?

I don't imagine A-R will be there a whole lot longer, but I could be wrong.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html