On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:20:18PM +0200,
Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
Section 3.2:
o If a message has a Valid Signature from an Author Domain, ADSP
provides no benefit relative to that domain since the message is
already known to be compliant with any possible ADSP for that
domain.
"If a message has an Author Signature, ..."?
It would still need to be valid unless it is clear in the document that
all Author Signatures are valid. Seems to be safer to specify "valid"
to me...
Section 3.2:
o If a message has a Valid Signature from a domain other than an
Author Domain, the receiver can use both the Signature and the
ADSP result in its evaluation of the message.
"If a message has a Valid Signature that from a domain other than an
Author Domain, or a Valid Signature from an Author Domain that does
not meet the requirements of Author Signature, .."?
I apologize for not re-reading all of the ADSP document, but I think we
have to remember that a message can have multiple DKIM signatures.
Perhaps that is what section 3.2 is trying to address?
--
Jeff Macdonald
jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html