Just to be clear, it is my intent to post an alternative tomorrow, which
I believe should be considered as such. The amount of verbiage being
proposed is excessive, given the stated problem. As such, I'd ask that
prior to a WGLC we gauge consensus on approach.
Thanks,
Eliot
On 2/9/09 5:13 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
FOlks,
In anticipation of a working group Last Call for the Errata, would anyone else
with concerns about the draft please post them so we can discuss and resolve
them?
<http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata>
As already noted, posting suggestions for specific changes greatly aids in
understanding the impact of the requested change.
Thanks.
d/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html